usually i not re-explain my post to those who not clever enough to understand them
but this time i will make a clarification
there was NOT any "double-standing" there was two different posts regarding different matters.
one about this CW rules in their current state.3 days limit and autofinish unless moderator sends a message not to finish it until some date.
and btw you lie that
everyone else said you SHOULDN'T have
nobody said that- moderators agreed that i was in my right to finish a time-outed game.
So 3 days is what you MUST do obligatory.
other post was about that - besides obligatory limit there is also a good will...a good play is send turn as soon as you reseive it not to wait till it will be three days without 5 minutes.Because if you send turns once in 3 days on constand basis you just can finish NP game withing month.
not being moderator i can do anything to change current rules i just encourage all to play fast and not create situations where game not finish within month.
So i cant say they must play faster obligatory but if they want some respect they could do that.
so where you see douible standing?
cant you see different between "they must do" and "they could do better"?
other,later statements were about how i would want to see an ideal tournament between a dedicated and responsible players.such tournament should go fast,a turn in 1 day (max of two days in effect of time zone) maybe even a several turns per day and if players in same time zone they can even finish game in one seat.however if a player wants to go out for holydays or something he can talk this about with oppenent and make even a week pause promising that he will finish game really fast later.But such trust between players could be only if they all responsible enough..enstead of that we have some laggers who tend to abuse any soft limits so if you offer to allow them to make several days pauses occasionally they will just do that every time.
am i making myself clear now?