Yea, it is VERY WELL example.

But this CAN be done just invading enemy allies, without neutrals. It is more difficult of course, but... so annoying when occur. More easy for sea maps for example.

Two points

1. If it is done by invading enemy allies then it is entirely legitimate.
2. Enforcer had definitely already lost the game on Emerald and been entirely outplayed. Even without the extra invading Norat controlled $11 of revenue to Enforcer's $7.

I am yet to see a situation where this can be used to win a game that wasn't won already. 300% is quite high - and if it wasn't for this so called bug - the requirement should be lower!

http://massiveassault.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1242

Again with the link! I've done that to wizo three times already, won a game that appeared like a losing prospect at first.

Agree with 3/7. Drakon did this to me twice on Emerald - in one case it was clear that he is going to loose ...
I was really upset And still am every time somebody do this. I ussually cover my borders, but it's useless when your oponent use transports this way.
I agree that this is a legitimate tactics if the engine allows it But I'll be very happy if next versions will allow me to deploy guerillas there and win

Yeah, there's no sense is re-writing the current game. We can't even get a patch to fix the 'falling bomb freezes the game' glitch, so what makes you think they'll fix this? Wait for PR.

but if u don't want to fork out more cash for pr and you are paying money monthly to play MAN then you would think they could fix the couple of known bugs.

but if u don't want to fork out more cash for pr and you are paying money monthly to play MAN then you would think they could fix the couple of known bugs.